From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Richard Krehbiel <rich@kastle.com>
Subject: Re: Any research putting c above ada?
Date: 1997/04/10
Message-ID: <u912rj925.fsf@kastle.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 232050796
References: <5ih6i9$oct$1@waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu>
Organization: Kastle Systems
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


kgoldin@galaxy.csc.calpoly.edu (Konstantin B. Goldin) writes:

> Hello,
> 
> Is there any research out there, that, comparing c and ada, (or c++ and
> ada), gives advantage to the c side? 

Here's a bit of research you can do yourself.

Can you go to the computer store and buy Microsoft Visual Ada 5.0?
Borland Turbo Ada?  Watcom Ada 4.0?  Can you find *anybody's* Ada
compiler at the local Comp USA store?  No.

-- 
Richard Krehbiel, Kastle Systems, Arlington, VA, USA
rich@kastle.com (work) or richk@mnsinc.com (personal)