From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Thread: 109fba,703c4f68db81387d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid109fba,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!elnk-atl-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net.POSTED!14bb18d8!not-for-mail Followup-To: yes Sender: mheaney@MHEANEYX200 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada) References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <871xau9nlh.fsf@insalien.org> <3SjWd.103128$Vf.3969241@news000.worldonline.dk> <87r7iu85lf.fsf@insalien.org> <1110052142.832650@athnrd02> <395uqaF5rhu2mU1@individual.net> <1110329098.642196@athnrd02> <1110361741.551255@athnrd02> <422edaec$0$26554$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <1111464133.508323@athnrd02> <423fe9df$0$11476$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> <1111521825.653841@athnrd02> <424094b0$0$11481$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> <1111568404.687226@athnrd02> <1111572591.296439@athnrd02> <1111574207.72969@athnrd02> <1111575629.998464@athnrd02> <1111607860.485769@athnrd02> From: Matthew Heaney User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:36:04 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.149.57.125 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net 1111631764 24.149.57.125 (Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:36:04 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:36:04 PST Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9870 comp.lang.c++:46971 Date: 2005-03-24T02:36:04+00:00 List-Id: Jim Rogers writes: > No containers are defined in Standard. I think the language model is that library-level declarations are "logically" nested within package Standard, so you could make an argument that the containers are indeed "defined in Standard." > There is no need for this in Ada. Hmmm... not sure what you mean. There certainly is a need to partition the global namespace, which is why we have the Ada, System, Interface, etc, package hierarchies. This is no different from what C++ does.