From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9026b81108642ee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!atl-c08.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pc02.usenetserver.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Address of an object References: <382nx7mt637x$.6hjqgb4zxzss.dlg@40tude.net> From: Stephen Leake Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:21:51 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8ryKA48X0D3hPp63XbjhvvMgr2E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com X-Trace: 722cc450bfa78759e00d431280 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6615 Date: 2006-09-16T09:21:51-04:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > Both X'Address and Unchecked_Conversion of a pointer to X would not give > the true address of X (i.e. the address returned by Allocate of the > corresponding storage pool). For an array type, X'Address is the address of > the first element, the dope is out. > > Is there any better way A better way to do what? What are you doing, that either X'Address or X'Access is wrong? -- -- Stephe