From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,faf469c89f73f91d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-25 07:33:01 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Matthew Heaney" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Package Instances??? Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:38:21 -0500 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: <721b6d80.0202131302.1ccce2ed@posting.google.com> <3C6BFAFC.7060902@mail.com> <3C73F5F6.7050704@mail.com> <3C7487D6.5060603@mail.com> <3C7676AF.9020404@mail.com> <3C78998A.10006@mail.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20374 Date: 2002-02-25T10:38:21-05:00 List-Id: "Hyman Rosen" wrote in message news:3C78998A.10006@mail.com... > Yes, that is exactly what I believe! I think it's Matthew Heaney > who is arguing otherwise. Well, if you say "implement it as a type in Ada," that also implies the use of a package, because you can't declare library-level types, only packages. Therefore I didn't think it was necessary to call out the use of a package explicitly. But if only say "implement it as a package in Ada," then that is ambiguous, because someone (like me) will think you mean to use only a package, and not an abstract data type too. Perhaps the locution "implement as an abstract data type declared in a package" is necessary to militate against any misunderstanding.