From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f51e93dacd9c7fca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-20 13:34:43 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!opentransit.net!wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: status of Ada STL?
Date: 20 Jun 2002 22:34:41 +0200
Organization: Home - http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
Message-ID: <u7kktk7tq.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
References: <bebbba07.0206132321.23d72ac8@posting.google.com>
 <aedgoc$to7$1@news.iucc.ac.il>
 <bebbba07.0206151051.1c25cf1e@posting.google.com> <uu1o31wbb.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <bebbba07.0206161023.6073fd3a@posting.google.com>
 <wcc8z5czi89.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <bebbba07.0206181937.2b17f4f2@posting.google.com> <uofe7k6ut.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <bebbba07.0206192358.56d5c46b@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: avelizy-103-1-5-203.abo.wanadoo.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 1024605282 12093 80.13.115.203 (20 Jun 2002 20:34:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Jun 2002 20:34:42 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.90
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26517
Date: 2002-06-20T20:34:42+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ) writes:

> Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message news:<uofe7k6ut.fsf@wanadoo.f> >      My_Function_Call \
> >         (First_Parameter  => 1, \
> >          Second_Parameter => "whatever", \
> >          Third_Parameter  => (1, 8, 9 10, 2, 0), \
> >          Last_One         => 12.89)
> > 
> > So you have removed one ";" and added four "\" !!!!!
> 
> Actually, you don't need ANY backslashes in your example (if you put
> the open "(" on the first line of the function call). If a "(" is
> unanswered by a ")", the compiler knows that the statement must
> continue on the next line.

Ok, and with this one:

        package My_New_Package is \
           new My_Package.My_Child_Generic_Package \
                (Name = ...,
                 Xyz  = ...);

You need 2 backslashes, then because you have '(' you don't need them
anymore... Consistency ??

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|         http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595