From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,496478b04bb5a6cf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-18 14:16:49 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: webcheck utility released Date: 18 Nov 2003 17:15:12 -0500 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: shevek.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1069193971 14919 128.183.235.101 (18 Nov 2003 22:19:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Nov 2003 22:19:31 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2654 Date: 2003-11-18T22:19:31+00:00 List-Id: "Randy Brukardt" writes: > "Stephen Leake" wrote in message > news:ullqd3ax0.fsf@nasa.gov... > > I've released version 1.0 of "webcheck"; a utility that finds and > > reports bad links on web sites. > > > > See http://www.toadmail.com/~ada_wizard/ > > I'm curious why you felt the need to build such a program from scratch > rather than using Tom Moran's Finder, which does that (and has for a long > time). (You can find it on AdaPower.) Tom's program checks local links, but > also checks foreign links, including those to FTP sites, and also handles > cookies so that sites that only work when cookies are accepted get properly > checked. I started with Tom's finder, but couldn't stand his coding style. I could not figure out how to make it use the file: scheme as well as http. I spent at least a full week on it; I eventually found it easier to start over. Tom's finder does have features that webcheck lacks (because I did not need them), and vice versa (because I did need them :). Which is one point in the Ada library debate; if I can't read and understand a library, I won't use it, no matter how many people claim it's good. Hmm. Unless I can get a good support contract with the authors; then I'll use it without reading it. > I used (with help from Tom) Finder as the basis of the indexer for > the Ada Search Engine on AdaIC. Glad to hear it is useful. -- -- Stephe