From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,faf469c89f73f91d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-20 15:52:31 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "Matthew Heaney" <mheaney@on2.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Package Instances???
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 18:44:32 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <u78ct3pvhjnbf1@corp.supernews.com>
References: <721b6d80.0202131302.1ccce2ed@posting.google.com>
 <a4emrg$kd0$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3C6BFAFC.7060902@mail.com>
 <x7v8z9u7dsk.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> <a4tm89$ajg$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <u75v5l119fc64c@corp.supernews.com> <3C73F5F6.7050704@mail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20186
Date: 2002-02-20T18:44:32-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message
news:3C73F5F6.7050704@mail.com...
> Given that C++ classes can have arbitrary
> things defined in them (types, static functions, constants, etc.)
> considering them as an analogue of Ada packages is not wrong.

But it is wrong if your purpose is to implement a type, so that you can
declare objects, which you can pass to subprograms, etc.  The fact that in
C++ you can declare things inside the class is irrelevent.