From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Luke A. Guest" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada on Android and iOS? Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:06:06 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <0561cbae-e6cc-46a1-8c72-b3d6a3f6ddc1@googlegroups.com> <68a11efb-0db6-489a-a401-7eb1425ce81an@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:06:06 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="32aaebf5436cd8bd352059d02dde4b8d"; logging-data="2962680"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19wddhHYol710BFY5+wQUPNSm72zXZn8W8=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lrdmv7e3GZ6dW4EsdxZxe2zqezU= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <68a11efb-0db6-489a-a401-7eb1425ce81an@googlegroups.com> Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:65338 List-Id: On 21/06/2023 08:01, Guillermo Hazebrouck wrote: > El martes, 20 de junio de 2023 a la(s) 23:27:20 UTC+2, Luke A. Guest escribió: >> On 20/06/2023 14:31, Guillermo Hazebrouck wrote: >>> El viernes, 24 de enero de 2014 a la(s) 00:48:07 UTC+1, Lucretia escribió: >>>> I built arm and mipsel Android GNAT using the svn/git 4.9.0 branch of GCC.I had to add in mips, but it built. Not done anything with it yet. >>>> >>>> Luke. >>> Do you still have this? Or could you explain how you created the toolchain? >>> Guillermo >> As a test, I updated my ndk and tried to compile both gcc 13 and 12, >> both failed. 13 with Ghost aspects and 12 with missing headers. >> >> They've changed the structure of the sysroot and I don't know enough >> about the android ndk anymore. > Ok, thanks for that. I guess It will be more productive and future-proof to explore the LLVM option... Any clue about that? I understand a bit the logic of LLVM, but putting it into practice probably won't be ease. AFAIK, just build the front end and then port the runtime.