From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1a9916933cd3f74
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-09 09:29:58 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail
From: Stephen Leake <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Next public release of GNAT(?)
Date: 09 Jan 2002 11:19:03 -0500
Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Message-ID: <u666b1oqw.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
References: <ILS_7.24134$KQ3.444593@news1.oke.nextra.no>
 <slrna3o297.2bn.gerhard@lilith.my-fqdn.de>
 <3c3c0ca8$0$3190$626a54ce@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1010593362 27240 128.183.220.71 (9 Jan 2002
 16:22:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: dscoggin@cne-odin.gsfc.nasa.gov
NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jan 2002 16:22:42 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18693
Date: 2002-01-09T16:22:42+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jean-Marc Bourguet <jm@bourguet.org> writes:

> Gerhard H�ring <gerhard@bigfoot.de> writes:
> 
> > Frank wrote in <ILS_7.24134$KQ3.444593@news1.oke.nextra.no>:
> > > Hi!
> > >  
> > > Is there any forecast on when(if?) the public/free GNAT 3-14 for Linux
> > > becomes available?
> > 
> > Yes, it will be the day after I managed to build GNAT from the gcc
> > source tree.
> 
> AFAIK, what is present in the CVS tree is an evolution of GNAT 3.14
> (which is still based on gcc 2.8).

No, the whole point of the gcc tree is that it is at gcc 3.0, and the
Ada code builds on that. This will be the basis of the ACT 3.15
release. 

> BTW, personnally, I'd not make public an executable I manage to
> build from non released sources.

Hmm. What do you mean by "released"? By ACT, or by the gcc team? If
the latter, I'd agree.

-- 
-- Stephe