From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,92892151eecb310d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-18 09:23:45 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.bc.tac.net!news.bc.tac.net!not-for-mail Sender: blaak@TORUS Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Porting Ada to C (Stealth development) References: <3C47375B.8060604@worldnet.att.net> <3C484D86.3DA70C2C@otelco.net> From: Ray Blaak Message-ID: Organization: The Transcend X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Date: 18 Jan 2002 09:21:16 -0800 NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.181.209.61 X-Complaints-To: news@bctel.net X-Trace: news.bc.tac.net 1011374617 208.181.209.61 (Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:23:37 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 09:23:37 PST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19053 Date: 2002-01-18T09:21:16-08:00 List-Id: Larry Hazel writes: > The few times I have been required to write in C, I wrote Ada anyway. Then > commented out the ada and hand translated to C. The only comments were the > Ada code and comments that were originally in the Ada code. I guess I am fundamentally a lazy programmer. Why implement it twice? This increases the chance for errors and is more work. When (not if!) you fix a bug, do you fix only the C code, or the Ada as well? How do you test the Ada fixes? If you have to write in a particular programming language (I mean just *have* to), it is fundamentally more efficient to write directly in that language, even if that language is deficient, using that language's mode of thought (influenced, of course, by the wisdom that Ada experience provides). -- Cheers, The Rhythm is around me, The Rhythm has control. Ray Blaak The Rhythm is inside me, blaak@telus.net The Rhythm has my soul.