From: Matthew Heaney <matthewjheaney@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: hashed_maps
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 04:41:35 GMT
Date: 2005-10-14T04:41:35+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u64s07ls8.fsf@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1129217108.662259.56960@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com
"Lucretia" <lucretia9@lycos.co.uk> writes:
> Now, I just need to know that what I'm doing with the ordered map
> isn't going to generate a linked list in which the search will end up
> linear as new C++ types are allocated as the key will be the address
> of the C++ instance. Should a hashed map be used, if so, how do you do
> this? I've only seen examples of hashing with strings.
The container standard guarantees that associative containers must
perform better than O(n), so a linked list would not be an acceptable
implementation.
It's probably quicker and easier to use the ordered map, since the "<"
operator for type Address is declared right there in package System.
If you want to use a hash table, then you can use To_Integer declared in
System.Storage_Elements to implement a hash function for type Adddress.
The generic actual for Equivalent_Keys is just "=".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-14 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-11 15:58 hashed_maps Lucretia
2005-10-11 17:45 ` hashed_maps Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-10-12 17:04 ` hashed_maps Lucretia
2005-10-13 5:17 ` hashed_maps Matthew Heaney
2005-10-13 14:45 ` hashed_maps Lucretia
2005-10-13 14:55 ` hashed_maps Matthew Heaney
2005-10-13 15:25 ` hashed_maps Lucretia
2005-10-13 19:47 ` hashed_maps Simon Wright
2005-10-14 4:35 ` hashed_maps Matthew Heaney
2005-10-14 4:41 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
2005-10-17 15:48 ` hashed_maps Lucretia
2005-10-13 20:55 ` hashed_maps Björn Persson
2005-10-13 21:27 ` hashed_maps Robert A Duff
2005-10-14 4:49 ` hashed_maps Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox