From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,5e54ec0ce937978 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: String literals and wide_string literals - how? References: <1177063665.093083.241580@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.213 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s21 1177202138 12.201.97.213 (Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:35:38 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:35:38 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:35:38 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15201 Date: 2007-04-22T00:35:38+00:00 List-Id: Simon Wright wrote: > > Well, on a PowerPC Z is 2#00001111# but I suspect you'd get a > different answer on a little-endian machine .. Actually, that's on a PowerPC with your specific compiler. Another compiler might give a different result for the same target. 2#00110011# is a perfectly acceptable result. That's why this kind of thing, while interesting, is not very useful. FWIW, with MinGW GNAT 3.4.2 targeting Windows XP on an AMD Turion64 X2, Z is 2#11110000#. -- Jeff Carter "People called Romanes, they go the house?" Monty Python's Life of Brian 79