From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b3258fa06e2efdf3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-01 08:45:44 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Tasks unleashed Date: 01 May 2003 11:40:49 -0400 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1051804566 29912 128.183.235.92 (1 May 2003 15:56:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 May 2003 15:56:06 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36811 Date: 2003-05-01T15:56:06+00:00 List-Id: Jano writes: > I seem to remember from a distant conversation that every task allocated > takes a small amount of memory, amongst other things, to provide > satisfactory results for 'Callable attribute. yes. > > > In any case, the memory thing forces to use pools of reusable tasks, > it's my main and crucial conclusion. Yes, this is the recommended approach. It's faster, also. -- -- Stephe