From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid113ae9,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!193.252.118.146.MISMATCH!news.wanadoo.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail Sender: obry@PASCAL Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.java.help Subject: Re: ADA vs Java References: From: Pascal Obry Date: 21 Jun 2005 19:25:23 +0200 Message-ID: Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Jun 2005 19:25:25 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.124.249.234 X-Trace: 1119374725 news.wanadoo.fr 11704 82.124.249.234:4153 X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11536 comp.lang.java.help:17826 Date: 2005-06-21T19:25:25+02:00 List-Id: HansF writes: > Q: So, why would a person not use the full Ada in a safety critical > application? But this is not a constraint imposed by the Ada vendors. Nobody on earth (I hope so at least) will use full Ada when it comes to human-lives as there is too many constructs that can't be verified/certified. At least that's what I like to think when I'm flying in an Air plane :) Pascal. -- --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://www.obry.net --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" --| --| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595