From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7a1691a2185bb3e7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-21 12:14:44 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!lnsnews.lns.cornell.edu!paradoxa.ogoense.net!sn-xit-04!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "Matthew Heaney" <mheaney@on2.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Bounds of Slice's return value 
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 15:19:27 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <u4otlji46nm3db@corp.supernews.com>
References: <87bsfrcksf.fsf@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19149
Date: 2002-01-21T15:19:27-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Matthew Woodcraft" <mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote in message
news:87bsfrcksf.fsf@chiark.greenend.org.uk...
> In particular, if I run the following program, should I always get '1',
> or is an implementation allowed to choose a different value?
>
> procedure Slice_Return_Value is
>    U : Unbounded_String := To_Unbounded_String ("hello");
>    S : String := Slice (U, 2, 3);
> begin
>    Put_Line (Integer'Image (S'first));
> end Slice_Return_Value;

You can fix this to specify the index constraint you desire, using a subtype
constraint:

declare
   F : constant Positive := 2;
   L : constant Positive := 3;
   S : constant String (1 .. L - F + 1) := Slice (U, F, L);
begin

or

declare
   F : constant Positive := 2;
   L : constant Positive := 3;
   S : constant String (F .. L) := Slice (U, F, L);
begin

Of course, this declares a constrained string object (no dope vector is
generated), so this is not strictly comparable to your original example.
You could fix that by using an explicit subtype:

declare
   F : constant Positive := 2;
   L : constant Positive := 3;
   subtype T is String (1 .. L - F + 1);
   S : constant String := T(Slice (U, F, L));
begin

or

declare
   F : constant Positive := 2;
   L : constant Positive := 3;
   subtype T is String (F .. L);
   S : constant String := T(Slice (U, F, L));
begin