From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,88093378be1184d4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-09 12:08:37 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: List Container Straw Man Date: 09 Nov 2001 15:05:52 -0500 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Message-ID: References: <9s941p$11mrei$4@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <9s99tt$pdb$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9s9s8p$11vt7l$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <9scke9$12jb14$4@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <3BEC1AAF.99531948@san.rr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1005336376 517 128.183.220.71 (9 Nov 2001 20:06:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: dscoggin@cne-odin.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Nov 2001 20:06:16 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16169 Date: 2001-11-09T20:06:16+00:00 List-Id: Darren New writes: > Stephen Leake wrote: > > Um, it is not wise to challenge a rocket scientist on this point! How > > many satellites have you launched recently? When was the last time you > > had to write code that met a 0.01 millisecond time stamp accuracy > > requirement, and did it continuously for a week straight? There is no > > place for abstract containers in this code; I need to control > > _everything_! > > On the other hand, it *is* a "newbie" library. I want to know where an > Ada newbie can get a job writing real-time code to run satellites. :-) > Everything I've seen has required five years or more of embedded > programming experience. Good point. Sorry for the flames :). > Seriously, I think the complications of storage pools, real-time, > etc etc might be too much to put into a simple language. By the time > you're writing your own storage pools, having three instantiations > to get to your desired data type probably isn't a problem, right? Yes, I was forgetting the newbie aspect. But "real-time" is not something that can be added later; it would be helpful to at least mention that aspect in this package. -- -- Stephe