From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,53c5fea49e77990c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-29 10:54:01 PST
Path:
archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!opentransit.net!wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Obry
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Dot Net ?
Date: 29 Mar 2002 19:54:02 +0100
Organization: Home - http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
Message-ID:
References:
<3CA48637.C5C4DEF5@despammed.com> <3ca487fd$1@news.cadence.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: avelizy-103-1-2-116.abo.wanadoo.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 1017428040 24014 217.128.15.116 (29 Mar 2002 18:54:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Mar 2002 18:54:00 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21858
Date: 2002-03-29T18:54:00+00:00
List-Id:
Jean-Marc Bourguet writes:
> Wes Groleau writes:
>
> > Ada on .Net would be a Good Thing, but if it
> > would remain truly Ada, it would be a Better Thing.
>
> I seem to remember that Eiffel changed its definition to better fit
> the model of .NET.
Well they do not have changed Eiffel definition, but they have created an
Eiffel .NET language. For example on .NET there is no multiple inheritance...
Pascal.
--
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"