From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d663b6230c9b3312
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!uns-out.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: AVR GCC/GNAT port quality ?
References: <DH1xw7pXJ2Vt@eisner.encompasserve.org>
From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:40:20 -0400
Message-ID: <u3b0e6g97.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sda8AbswHTJjcDU6DXayXVm3GR4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com
Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com
X-Trace: d65ef46810934a9acbc6721165
X-Original-Bytes: 1347
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16316
Date: 2007-06-26T08:40:20-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP (Simon Clubley) writes:

> I'm thinking of using the AVR microcontroller along with the AVR GNAT
> compiler in a project.
>
> Would anyone here like to offer an opinion on the quality of the GNAT
> AVR port ?

I don't know about the AVR port in particular, but AdaCore in general
offers a very high quality product, both the compiler/runtime and the
support. I would assume the AVR port would be equally high quality.

If you anticipate buying their support for this project, you should
ask for an evaluation copy, and try it out.

-- 
-- Stephe