From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,971aa11c293c3db1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-24 17:10:58 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news-hub.siol.net!zur.uu.net!ash.uu.net!spool1.news.uu.net!spool0.news.uu.net!reader2.news.uu.net!not-for-mail Sender: DB3L@CTWD0143 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada The Best Language? References: <5be89e2f.0107170838.c71ad61@posting.google.com> <5be89e2f.0107180235.726d46a8@posting.google.com> <9j3rrd$g71$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net> <5be89e2f.0107181300.4b4e93d7@posting.google.com> <3B57195E.A3A3FED@home.com> <5be89e2f.0107191336.39376b9@posting.google.com> <3B5CE9D7.CB4AE34B@home.com> From: David Bolen Date: 24 Jul 2001 20:11:15 -0400 Message-ID: Organization: Fitlinxx, Inc. - Stamford, CT X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.247.212.3 X-Trace: reader2.news.uu.net 996019856 154 208.247.212.3 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10540 Date: 2001-07-24T20:11:15-04:00 List-Id: "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" writes: > The www.adaic.org site is a starting place. See: > > http://www.adaic.org/intro/c.html > > I am sure that others in this ng can give additional references, and in > some cases testimonials ;-) Not to derail the better language discussion, but I'm not a current Ada user and have been lurking for a bit here following the various URLs and what not, and I was curious about one thing I noticed. I can't help but be struck by the fact that in almost all cases (clearly there were a few exceptions), the various documents and comparisions, and studies, and even some FAQs that I'm able to track down all seem to be years old at this point (some over 5 years). The above URL is a good example. The topmost entry on the above referenced page (with a banner of "NEW") is from early 1998. Nothing in the news but a few conferences were later than 1999 and the current issue of AdaIC news is Fall of 1997. And that seems more the rule than the exception from my browsing. I've also hit more stray/broken links on the Ada pages than I've seen in a long time. Now clearly there doesn't have to be any strong correlation between such information and the language's viability itself, nor am I trying to read too much into it, but I couldn't help but notice it, and it just seemed strange that I didn't find more active, and more importantly, recent, bits of information. Given that posters here clearly find use of the language in current, commercial (not just military although that's obviously still true) environments, is it just a poor net-presence language, or lack of interest, or am I just looking in the wrong places? Thanks. -- -- David -- /-----------------------------------------------------------------------\ \ David Bolen \ E-mail: db3l@fitlinxx.com / | FitLinxx, Inc. \ Phone: (203) 708-5192 | / 860 Canal Street, Stamford, CT 06902 \ Fax: (203) 316-5150 \ \-----------------------------------------------------------------------/