From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7eaf9f2597de2259
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-04 14:05:13 PST
Path:
archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!134.222.94.5!npeer.kpnqwest.net!news.edf.fr!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Obry
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: on package naming, should the word "_pkg" be part of it?
Date: 04 Oct 2001 22:54:35 +0200
Organization: Home - http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
Sender: obry@PASCAL
Message-ID:
References: <9pif1o01btl@drn.newsguy.com> <3BBCC7EF.6C59C85D@otelco.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 163.107.131.50
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: clnews.edf.fr 1002228972 1911 163.107.131.50 (4 Oct 2001 20:56:12
GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsadm@news.edf.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Oct 2001 20:56:12 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.106
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13742
Date: 2001-10-04T20:56:12+00:00
List-Id:
Larry Hazel writes:
>
> That is sponsored by the Department of Redundancy Department. I think it is an
> ugly distraction, similar to adding _Type to type names. I notice the RM
> doesn't defint Integer_Type, Float_Type, etc.
No but it does define File_Type :) But I find also ugly the _pck. Better to
find the right name for the package.
Pascal.
--
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"