From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Ada decimal types
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 05:14:25 -0400
Date: 2006-05-05T05:14:25-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u1wv8dea6.fsf@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1146756192.545514.109110@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
"REH" <spamjunk@stny.rr.com> writes:
> We are in the process of converting our software from '83 to '95, and
> have the opportunity to port over to some of the new features 95
> provides. We have a 64-bit mission time that is represented as a
> record of two 32-bit values (one for seconds and one for microseconds).
> Is it advantagous to use:
>
> type Mission_Time_Type is delta 1.0e-6 digits 16 range 0.0 .. (2.0**32)
> - 1.0;
>
> instead?
Instead of what? you didn't say what type the 32 bit values have.
I would use a fixed point type, not a decimal type.
I would also use a 64 bit fixed point type, rather than a split
record, but you probably can't change that.
--
-- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-05 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-04 15:23 Ada decimal types REH
2006-05-04 18:17 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-05-04 22:20 ` REH
2006-05-05 9:14 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2006-05-05 11:33 ` REH
2006-05-05 16:49 ` tmoran
2006-05-05 18:08 ` REH
2006-05-05 18:49 ` tmoran
2006-05-05 18:59 ` REH
2006-05-06 8:59 ` Keith Thompson
2006-05-06 14:01 ` REH
2006-05-06 15:48 ` Simon Wright
2006-05-06 16:39 ` REH
2006-05-08 21:19 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-05-09 23:21 ` REH
2006-05-10 1:08 ` Keith Thompson
2006-05-10 5:37 ` Simon Wright
2006-05-10 12:22 ` REH
2006-05-10 20:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-05-10 21:26 ` REH
2006-05-10 20:52 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-05-11 5:51 ` Simon Wright
2006-05-11 22:33 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-05-05 20:32 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox