From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,11c630572e59f461 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!uns-out.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: The Ada 2005 name References: From: Stephen Leake Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 05:47:48 -0500 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:rVzUK9u51epJPWEauvMGxqA/53g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com X-Trace: da83d45e017d4759e00d427736 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9482 Date: 2007-02-24T05:47:48-05:00 List-Id: dirk@cs.kuleuven.ac.be (Dirk Craeynest) writes: > I notice that once in a while there appears to be some confusion > about how to refer to the latest Ada language definition. > > FYI, the internationally accepted recommendation is to use the name > "Ada 2005". Thank you! -- -- Stephe