From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,71b19e01eae3a390
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "isaac buchwald" <isaac.buchwald@velenje.cx>
Subject: Re: delay until and GNAT - expand
Date: 1999/05/11
Message-ID: <u1%Z2.22$801.870688@news.siol.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 476695054
References: <m3_X2.48$6o.1372369@news.siol.net>
 <7gpukr$s82$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7grkbb$cee$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <7grvka$lc5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <k_kY2.71$6o.2036023@news.siol.net>
 <rracine.12.00086B05@draper.com> <7h1e10$drg$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <rracine.13.0007AF82@draper.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Organization: SiOL
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 20:54:18 MET DST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-05-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

  Gnat  have  the  number   (kind of metric )  but   the  don't  want to
publish   it.
   Does  anybody   wander   why   there  are  no more   ada  aficados.

                     Have a  nice  day   -  specialy  R.  Dewar !



Roger Racine wrote in message ...
>>In article <rracine.12.00086B05@draper.com>,
>>  rracine@draper.com (Roger Racine) wrote:
>  ......
>>>
>>> I am surprised GNAT documentation does not have this, except that the
number
>>> will be different for every underlying OS.
>>>
>>> Roger Racine
>
cycles + the underlying
>operating system context switch" would meet the spirit of the RM.  I know
Wind
>River publishes their bounds.  It is quite reasonable to have users of the
>metrics look at other documentation, as long as it is referenced.
>
>Roger Racine