From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Contracts in generic formal subprogram
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 10:02:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u0r72o$16jtj$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c555ce7-0b2e-49f1-8930-c4f4796793e4n@googlegroups.com>
On 2023-04-08 09:00, mockturtle wrote:
> Should the actual subprogram specify the same contract? I am not sure (and I guess this could be a stumbling block for the adoption of this idea).
The general principle of substitutability is that the preconditions can
be weakened, the postoconditions can be strengthened.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-08 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-08 7:00 Contracts in generic formal subprogram mockturtle
2023-04-08 8:02 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2023-04-11 5:56 ` G.B.
2023-04-11 12:03 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2023-04-12 2:18 ` Spiros Bousbouras
2023-04-12 3:37 ` Spiros Bousbouras
2023-04-12 6:49 ` Niklas Holsti
2023-04-12 7:30 ` G.B.
2023-04-12 12:29 ` Ben Bacarisse
2023-04-13 6:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2023-04-08 9:09 ` Randy Brukardt
2023-04-08 16:48 ` Simon Wright
2023-04-08 17:27 ` mockturtle
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox