From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,8d52d4fbf051d828 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.180.95.2 with SMTP id dg2mr831897wib.2.1347644651232; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Path: ed8ni64862666wib.0!nntp.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!94.232.116.11.MISMATCH!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.panservice.it!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Status of GNADE ODBC under Debian 64-bit Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:10:27 +0200 Organization: cbb software GmbH Message-ID: References: <85r4qe9n5e.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <7818bc08-d0ec-4c23-bd51-a6e6bb305cb8@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de NNTP-Posting-Host: FbOMkhMtVLVmu7IwBnt1tw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-09-07T14:10:27+02:00 List-Id: On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 04:25:32 -0700 (PDT), Graham Stark wrote: > the scary bit is that (if I've read this right) sometimes function returns > are 32 bit and sometimes 64 bit depending on the inputs. This was always the case for most C bindings and MS ones especially. > We're going to > need a slightly thicker binding than at present to handle this, I'd think. Yes. Simple components provide a safer layer on top GNADE ODBC. E.g. controlled types for handles, typed SQLGetData, etc. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de