From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ee10ec601726fbf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-01 14:28:08 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "Matthew Heaney" <mheaney@on2.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: why not
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 17:31:20 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <tu3j3j5b5dlaa2@corp.supernews.com>
References: <3BC5D730.DA950CC7@boeing.com> <9q4pa7$1ad$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <slrn9sdahp.k4.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de> <3BC6ACC8.23EF21BC@free.fr>
 <QQCx7.26073$ev2.34583@www.newsranger.com> <3BC71F54.1FFE78FA@boeing.com>
 <1KGx7.26476$ev2.35117@www.newsranger.com> <3BC7AD82.2A0CCCD4@acm.org>
 <usncjtzix.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> <9qhiqr$af0$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <K1Zy7.12219$hT5.3979715684@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
 <1nDC7.180$6S7.92255364@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
 <9rjsak$bp3$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <jbfstt097fvrrqmrl0kuscmbl57neg8imf@4ax.com>
 <9rmhb9$o1b$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3BDEF0FE.B55FED9E@san.rr.com>
 <9rmuqi$es$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3BDF1F13.4B99361C@san.rr.com>
 <9rnbtv$5i4$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3BE03E54.57E0E6C8@san.rr.com>
 <tu0gfdn5h25i11@corp.supernews.com> <Z_dE7.8725$xS6.11497@www.newsranger.com>
 <9rrush$ckt$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <tu33v69r072706@corp.supernews.com>
 <jcjE7.9156$xS6.12795@www.newsranger.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15594
Date: 2001-11-01T17:31:20-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Ted Dennison" <dennison@telepath.com> wrote in message
news:jcjE7.9156$xS6.12795@www.newsranger.com...
> (sigh). I hate to see this devolve into our usual naming war, but...
>
> The name seems to have been picked to be consistent with how Ada.Strings
was
> named. That's a fine goal on its own, but I do *not* want to see the
horrible
> naming mistake that those packages made
(Ada.Strings.Unbounded.Unbounded_String)
> duplicated here for the sake of consistency (or for the sake of anything
else).
> Please, no redundant information in the names!

The intent is that you use a use clause for the Ada.Strings.* packages.
That's the motivation for their naming convention.