From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,18bcdad971d6f9df
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-23 09:46:12 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "David Botton" <David@Botton.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OODBMS For Ada
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:46:07 -0400
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <ttb7mjpeoq5ebb@corp.supernews.com>
References: <mailman.1003854394.23005.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15096
Date: 2001-10-23T12:46:07-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

With a COM interface in an Inproc (DLL) based server, performance should not
suffer at all. There may be similar performance solutions using CORBA, you
will likely need to check with each vendor about how they go about their
binding/solution.

David Botton

"Eric Merritt" <cyberlync@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> I actually hadn't thought of that. Any idea on how
> this affects performance?