From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d402e2c741db0d0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-09 18:56:35 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!priapus.visi.com!orange.octanews.net!news.octanews.net!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!nntp.abs.net!newsfeed.mathworks.com!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!216.166.71.14!border3.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:56:32 -0600
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 21:56:34 -0500
From: Ze Administrator <groleau+news@freeshell.org>
Reply-To: groleau+news@freeshell.org
Organization: Ain't no organization here!
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
 rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes
References: <b4682ab7.0401071805.5bc07078@posting.google.com>
 <4LKdnRRNyv6AlmCiRVn-ig@comcast.com>
 <b4682ab7.0401080918.53ca089@posting.google.com>
 <wcc1xqa1fmj.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <6bSdnYBKy_diPGCi4p2dnA@gbronline.com>
 <wccn08yqhim.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <NaydnWqMAo1_umOi4p2dnA@gbronline.com>
 <wccd69sg1yr.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
In-Reply-To: <wccd69sg1yr.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <tt2dnbTlYMd99GKiRVn-hg@gbronline.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.9.86.110
X-Trace: 
 sv3-S2g6j+K26JzTy2hpdcThxcjT5lBa7ew9jCJQJaQABFIXqWlYQfQgK02eNgq3w5HfFqogvYFgRzsg0Y6!hs72lr7WouHAMcVtusmDbGFU+hhG6jCBI2cn7Lnpspm/U+IAIXrVf13KlQqXY3D2A6KUdln18/v4!ig==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4290
Date: 2004-01-09T21:56:34-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert A Duff wrote:
> The issue is not (directly) which types are visible, but which "="
> functions are visible (either implicitly declared by type declarations,
> or explicitly declared as functions).

If the types are visible, and 'use' or 'use type'
has been used, then "=" is visible.