From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d6589e7b2c60444
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-04 20:28:10 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 22:28:16 -0500
Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 22:28:37 -0500
From: Wesley Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com>
Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com
Organization: Ain't no organization here!
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
 rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: employment with ada
References: <626e8ae.0305011636.5e899da3@posting.google.com>
 <4mo7bvc2n70k6eikm3muu2965nbo3m77ov@4ax.com> <3EB415CB.6D97B14D@adaworks.com>
 <1f3abv0c5majluvng6g19aheea80i63res@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <1f3abv0c5majluvng6g19aheea80i63res@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <tsecnZhUY7zNRyijXTWcog@gbronline.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.44
X-Trace: 
 sv3-5fbNCmi0/hIPiW0UF2Ei1z4xjznZApIOQxDBczi4umjkyVHMhUUL7KF53JruVVWoU3eYf62KBd7Xo11!fyGhbiVtfJZLdc2QbuJ+kYzQTGjUToymaj99R+xxu2xqrIUiNGVuj/NBwoEagNvoExXS6cIv/vZN!KBjh
X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36950
Date: 2003-05-04T22:28:37-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> Dec never made an Ada 95 for VMS.  I just learned that Rational Rose
> RealTime doesn't speak Ada.  What's with that?  If you can't generate
> code automatically from one of the most popular UML tools in
> existence, what does that say?

I last worked on VMS when DEC Ada 3.0 came out.  It was Ada 83
but it had and "abstract" feature that had some similarities
to the abstract constructs in Ada 95.  No, DEC did not make an
Ada 95 for VMS, but they did hire ACT to make it for them and
they put their "label" on it.

Rose _does_ generate Ada.  I have not seen whether it's "good"
Ada.  I kind of doubt it, since the general approach of Rose
is _obviously_ oriented toward C++