From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,eb0daafec4ae827a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newsfeeder.syd.optusnet.com.au!news.optusnet.com.au!not-for-mail
From: Peter Morris <no@spam.please.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: High-integrity networking
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:24:40 +0930
Message-ID: <ts6qg3h5kp9n1jnkisql5k53c5qlock1pg@4ax.com>
References: <1191845623.383675.190820@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
 <_VwOi.141398$Fc.15278@attbi_s21>
 <1191935853.244559.87440@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
 <i3kpg35i0p81nkjo4ifo6448otdnmcb56o@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 58.110.84.86
X-Trace: 1192042467  18984 58.110.84.86
X-Original-Bytes: 2164
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2416
Date: 2007-10-11T04:24:40+09:30
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:16:11 +0100, Brian Drummond
<brian_drummond@btconnect.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:17:33 -0700, Maciej Sobczak
><see.my.homepage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 8 Pa , 23:02, "Jeffrey R. Carter"
>><spam.jrcarter....@acm.nospam.org> wrote:
>>
>
>>I have already found CSP (Communicating Sequential Processes), which
>>is one possible approach, although what I have seen up to now leaves
>>some "minor" details in the air, like the startup of the whole system.
>>Ravenscar can afford this, because it's the language implementation
>>that has to more or less transparently take care of all these issues,
>>but heterogenous systems might need some more explicit handling.
>>
>>In any case - is this (CSP) the only keyword in this subject?
>
>I don't suppose there are any occam compilers still running?
>

The Kent Retargetable Occam Compiler now compiles an extended version
of occam (occam-pi)
http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/projects/ofa/kroc/

There is a portable runtime here with support for the Lego Mindstorm
http://www.transterpreter.org/

SPOC occam to C compiler
http://www.itk.ntnu.no/ansatte/Hendseth_Sverre/occam/index.html

A support group for the CSP model of parallel processing.
http://www.wotug.org

Proceedings of a recent conference.
http://wotug.org/paperdb/show_proc.php?f=4&num=25


Regards,
Peter Morris