From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2702c1ed8be62863 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: to.reply@read.my.sig (Rick Thorne) Subject: Re: What ada 83 compiler is *best* Date: 1998/12/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 420115522 References: <3666F5A4.2CCF6592@maths.unine.ch> <87k903u4oj.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com> <366D4B3B.504810FB@gecm.com> Organization: Some, but limited Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-12-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <366D4B3B.504810FB@gecm.com>, David Gillon wrote: > Rick Thorne wrote: > > > My question to the news group was this: does Ada have a future? > > Yes. More specifically, in the general arena probably only in niche > markets, but in the safety critical arena there really isn't any > language that has been shown to be superior [-] Another excellent response, and I thank you, David. Like Marin, you've identified the utility of Ada in a niche market, and you've both shown me that it's stable in its niche (see my reply to Marin). Thanx. -- ? Rick Thorne ? "I'm quite illiterate, ? ? software engineer by day ? but I read a lot" ? ? harried father of two by night ? J. D. Salinger ? ? rick.thorne@lmco.com ? ? ? http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Oracle/6816/ ?