From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,93a8020cc980d113
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What is wrong with Ada?
References: <1176150704.130880.248080@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
 <awirc4gv13.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <461BA892.3090002@obry.net> <yeabxgnsrj.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <82dgve.spf.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <1176226291.589741.257600@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
 <4eaive.6p9.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <sa4ps6apjb7.fsf@margay.local>
 <wccwt0ho2fc.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <1rbtw92apxpl1.1ednvo8v6oiq8$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <aslkgxyvpj.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <el1sx203zohn$.1ehb1vbs3p0vd.dlg@40tude.net>
 <mn3b33w7tf.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <13tcswu59l28h.zxb26cabf9a0.dlg@40tude.net>
 <thr6ql7hkp.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <15k5b4j6za8ag.tpkuccinvzbd.dlg@40tude.net>
 <olbqhpb8no.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <p7ibl3458b2.1tm8ncvvgn1wq.dlg@40tude.net>
 <bzm58zo4n.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <1176796706.9578.18.camel@localhost>
 <109tsryjbjwzz.3mmbgnp1pjjo$.dlg@40tude.net>
From: Markus E Leypold
 <development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de>
Organization: N/A
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:48:25 +0200
Message-ID: <tmmz17p98m.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hWW5C0cFM7eIUgZvsAiYOqk9FR4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.220.162
X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1176806449 88.72.220.162 (17 Apr 2007 12:40:49
 +0200)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.germany.com!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15081
Date: 2007-04-17T12:48:25+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:

> (Under certain conditions "processing", "program", "language" are all
> equivalent.)

I doubt that. One of the reasons why I tried a more formal approach
was to avoid that loophole of meandering terminology.

Regards -- Markus