From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ce828272f314121 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!12.120.4.37!attcg2!ip.att.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: output of enumeration types Date: 18 Apr 2005 22:03:30 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1113879782 385 192.135.80.34 (19 Apr 2005 03:03:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 03:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10558 Date: 2005-04-18T22:03:30-05:00 List-Id: In article , Robert A Duff writes: > By the way, "Roman_Digit" is a strange name -- in what sense are these > symbols "digits"? It makes sense to me -- it takes a whole string of them to make a "number".