From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.236.94.238 with SMTP id n74mr452425yhf.27.1400041818052;
 Tue, 13 May 2014 21:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 border2.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog4.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!c1no6095778igq.0!news-out.google.com!k18ni14qav.1!nntp.google.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx31.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64;
 rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/32.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Safety of unprotected concurrent operations on constant objects
References: <slrnlm6mkg.i0l.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
 <slrnlmcoqd.i0l.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
 <waw9v.109142$f85.65293@fx19.iad> <scy9v.1071029$2N5.142769@fx05.iad>
 <kxy9v.109149$f85.89664@fx19.iad> <lyzjiw7h6c.fsf@pushface.org>
 <fRN9v.204655$Ng5.180587@fx17.iad>
 <t7a0jcl05g1h.11jb75b2jg1l7.dlg@40tude.net> <eT_9v.574$dr.264@fx27.iad>
 <83ha6vuynrzs.1jk08faxb8mnl.dlg@40tude.net> <xtDav.68151$7X2.15124@fx19.iad>
 <1jebi7cf92ak4.1trmstj8qi3wm.dlg@40tude.net> <zv4bv.5236$pa5.5140@fx23.iad>
 <1i6pyg077xlrv.vnwotzzgb0ut$.dlg@40tude.net> <nYobv.8538$116.7932@fx21.iad>
 <10pk27v48vhcb$.1qkf6roq2yzjn$.dlg@40tude.net> <RVObv.4489$TT7.3088@fx02.iad>
 <1qq0ryc8c4l2m.1driqwwiwwl02.dlg@40tude.net>
 <%vhcv.255737$s87.168969@fx11.iad>
 <fw1hrdv0jufx$.fetdmr8mer8o$.dlg@40tude.net> <qtqcv.27961$hv6.6727@fx17.iad>
 <1tb8my720vum2$.r9u7r03btzqm.dlg@40tude.net> <lktv6n$kit$1@loke.gir.dk>
In-Reply-To: <lktv6n$kit$1@loke.gir.dk>
Message-ID: <tjCcv.246163$d32.82688@fx31.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 04:30:17 UTC
Organization: TeraNews.com
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 22:30:23 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 1790
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3935730878
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-Bytes: 2163
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:186402
Date: 2014-05-13T22:30:23-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 13-May-14 14:27, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> Perhaps that will happen
> anyway, given the slow uptake of Ada 2012 by other vendors.

Who else besides AdaCore is doing an Ada 2012 implementation?