From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9ea66d3dcd0bfcf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-07 23:36:56 PST From: Brian Orpin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] XML/Ada 0.5 released Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 07:36:50 +0100 Reply-To: abuse@borpin.co.uk (Brian Orpin This is valid) Message-ID: References: X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: ect0311.ct.edinbr.gecm.com X-Trace: 8 May 2001 07:28:53 GMT, ect0311.ct.edinbr.gecm.com Path: newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!212.74.64.35!colt.net!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!btnet-peer0!btnet-feed5!btnet!newreader.ukcore.bt.net!pull.gecm.com!ect0311.ct.edinbr.gecm.com Xref: newsfeed.google.com comp.lang.ada:7309 Date: 2001-05-08T07:36:50+01:00 List-Id: On Sun, 06 May 2001 13:50:39 GMT, Emmanuel Briot wrote: >[Posted on behalf of Robert Dewar] > >First, a general note, the direct posts you saw from me in this >thread are not posts at all, but the results of some very strange >cc mechanism in what were intended to be personal replies to David >Botton. Tricky this email stuff. The messages clearly state that they are 'To' the mail-news gateway that David obviously uses as well as David himself. >From David's posts Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Cc: To: Return-Path: So clearly if Robert had simply replied the reply to address is the mail-news gateway at ada.eu.org. Hardly some strange cc mechanism. It just sounded to me like Robert was blaming David for his own incompetence with an email client. GIGO -- Brian Orpin BAE SYSTEMS, Edinburgh "If you really know C++, there isn't much you can't do with it, though it may not always be what you intended!" Tucker Taft 1998