From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2ff5c149712ec0eb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!feeder.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer1.kpn.DE!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Ada Interfaces and the Liskov Substitution Principle
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705232101220.20072@th.informatik.uni-mannheim.de>
 <871wh7i8lq.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <f32det$fim$1@jacob-sparre.dk>
 <4655D90D.7040709@obry.net>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 20:39:14 +0200
Message-ID: <tii7nk5e3998$.1xfer2lqmixvy.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 May 2007 20:39:10 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 993d0462.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=S5>9_T4@;FZU6b:FjPaGjQMcF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQFl8W>\BH3YRWCQV8EMQhoRDNcfSJ;bb[UIRnRBaCd<M^aSJCSk`BTjW3XPn@_C_ek]
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15918
Date: 2007-05-24T20:39:10+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:27:25 +0200, Pascal Obry wrote:

> Randy Brukardt a �crit :
>> Right. The most general type of interface is a limited interface; every
>> interface should be declared limited if possible. (We didn't make that the
>> default solely because it would be inconsistent with the rest of the
>> language.) 
> 
> Well a task type is limited by default, idem for a protected object types.

Randy probably meant that If it were limited then one would need to
introduce "not limited" qualifier to be able to declare a non-limited
interface. (In addition to awful "not null")

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de