From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b3edde39ad90f1b7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
Subject: Re: Representation clauses and streams
Date: 1999/12/30
Message-ID: <tgr9g4rhmf.fsf@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 566419837
Sender: rusfw@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
References: <tgso0lg67p.fsf@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
 <84du8g$c67$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Organization: Comp.Center (RUS), U of Stuttgart, FRG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-12-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:

> > Is there any reason why GNAT
> > ignores the implementation advice 13.13.2(17)?
> 
> GNAT is NOT ignoring this advice

Yes, you're right.  I missed the words `base range' (or didn't understand
their implications).  I'm sorry about that.