From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,235659b21b3d24ab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-27 08:33:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!194.8.194.95!news.netcologne.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!nntp.cs.uni-magdeburg.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!cert.uni-stuttgart.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT? Date: 27 Sep 2001 17:32:19 +0200 Organization: RUS-CERT, University of Stuttgart, Germany Sender: rusfw@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de Message-ID: References: <2t2r7.26711$QK.21818615@news1.sttln1.wa.home.com> <8766aajjvh.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: hornet.rus.uni-stuttgart.de 1001604752 19165 129.69.1.226 (27 Sep 2001 15:32:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cert.uni-stuttgart.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 15:32:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13437 Date: 2001-09-27T17:32:19+02:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison writes: > In article <8766aajjvh.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer says... > > > >Are there any ideas how to ensure binary compatibility across GNAT > >builds from different distributors of the same operating system? > > Pardon me for a naieve question: What exactly, save a source code > modification, would cause such an incompatability? Different sonames for the GNAT run-time library, or a diffent default threading implementation.