From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d495ab2e69ad1962 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ravenscar-compliant bounded buffer References: <1188914005.607732.277400@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com> <1189194299.326741.151840@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> <46e28a6a$0$27847$39db0f71@news.song.fi> <46e3ccfd$1_4@news.bluewin.ch> <46E3FA9A.6090409@obry.net> From: Markus E L Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 18:05:12 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) Cancel-Lock: sha1:pcWM88AatMcNJAjlEms9v+U1trY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.74.50.142 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1189353645 88.74.50.142 (9 Sep 2007 18:00:45 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.germany.com!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1842 Date: 2007-09-09T18:05:12+02:00 List-Id: 'anon AT anon DOT org (anon)' wrote: > I CALL THEM AS I SEE THEM! TROLL. > > And for me I do not care what you think of my CREDIBILITY is, > but since a lot of you have decided to fight, I think most that > will read these post here would say your CREDIBILITY, is the > one that is zero. Because at some point I give information that > can be seen as legal proof. Legal proof? I must've missed that. How does it looke like in your hands? Or do you propose that you're testifying as witness? If so, the question of credibility creeps in ... -- uh oh. - M