From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f948976d12c7ee33 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-24 00:35:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!cyclone.bc.net!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny01.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030616 Thunderbird/0.1a X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Boeing and Dreamliner References: <3EF5F3F3.6000806@attbi.com> <3EF7F94D.5080105@attbi.com> In-Reply-To: <3EF7F94D.5080105@attbi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:35:53 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.84.210.104 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrdny01.gnilink.net 1056440153 162.84.210.104 (Tue, 24 Jun 2003 03:35:53 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 03:35:53 EDT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39640 Date: 2003-06-24T07:35:53+00:00 List-Id: Robert I. Eachus wrote: > First, wrong! The software was well documented. This is the report: . This is a quote from the report: The Board has also noted that the systems specification of the SRI does not indicate operational restrictions that emerge from the chosen implementation. Such a declaration of limitation, which should be mandatory for every mission-critical device, would have served to identify any non-compliance with the trajectory of Ariane 5. So I can believe you, or I can believe them. Which shall it be?