From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4bad154e6810a16c,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: cdecker@snet.net (Decker, Christian R)
Subject: Elaboration Problem
Date: 1999/06/09
Message-ID: <tUu73.115$S7.66699@WReNphoon3>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 487506065
X-Trace: WReNphoon3 928938649 10.0.2.35 (Wed, 09 Jun 1999 07:30:49 PDT)
Organization: http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start Here
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 07:30:49 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-06-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I have a constant being declared inside a generic where the value being used
for the constant is obtained from
a lookup table.  Later on in a subprogram the constant value is used rather
than the lookuptable and to my suprise
the constant is not correct.

if i do a comparison between the constant and the lookup table value in the
same subprogram they are not equal.

Has anyone ever seen behavior like this?

Is this an elaboration problem where  the constant is being assigned a value
before the Ada package that the
lookup table resides in elaborates?

any suggestions?



   -**** Posted from RemarQ, http://www.remarq.com/?a ****-
 Search and Read Usenet Discussions in your Browser - FREE -