From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c74781e34db23310 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-15 12:50:35 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsrout1.ntli.net!news.ntli.net!newspeer1-win.server.ntli.net!newsfe1-win.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Application Size in Ada References: <87y8ox2jpq.fsf@insalien.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:52:57 +0100 NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.107.63.68 X-Trace: newsfe1-win 1082058585 81.107.63.68 (Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:49:45 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:49:45 GMT Organization: NTL Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7162 Date: 2004-04-15T20:52:57+01:00 List-Id: chris wrote: > > You can import DLLs written in many other compilers/languages fairly > easily, providing they don't require any special runtime be setup prior > to accessing them. Going the other way, say from GNAT to C (gcc) is a > little more difficult because you have to initialise the Ada runtime and > the C won't necessarily understand the Ada types. Doh! Me stupid! I should have said you to deal with elaboration for the library, not the Ada runtime. Where's my brain been the past 6 weeks?