From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY, TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e91f674b5db5e2b2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-17 07:17:11 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!news-out.spamkiller.net!propagator-la!news-in-la.newsfeeds.com!news-in.superfeed.net!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: Subject: Re: Access types and classwide programming Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:16:57 EDT Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:16:57 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13122 Date: 2001-09-17T14:16:57+00:00 List-Id: In article , tmoran@acm.org says... > >> For x'address use blah; >> ... >> (PC with Win9x) > You're barking up the wrong tree if you start worrying about address >clauses for an OS on x86 machines - they use IO instructions, not memory >mapped IO. Now I'm just getting into this, so correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't I/O to the PCI bus done almost entirely with memory mapped addresses and interrupts? --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com