From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e5eb8ca5dcea2827 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Hyman Rosen Subject: Re: Ada OO Mechanism Date: 1999/05/25 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 482120654 Sender: hymie@calumny.jyacc.com References: <7i05aq$rgl$1@news.orbitworld.net> <7i17gj$1u1k@news2.newsguy.com> <7icgkg$k4q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3749E9EC.2842436A@aasaa.ofe.org> <7id2eo$fag@drn.newsguy.com> <3749FF7D.F17CE16A@aasaa.ofe.org> <374AC676.F7AE0772@lmco.com> <7ieuja$5v9@news1.newsguy.com> <7ifd6l$bmf@sjx-ixn1.ix.netcom.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com X-Trace: news.panix.com 927679638 1472 209.49.126.226 (26 May 1999 00:47:18 GMT) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 May 1999 00:47:18 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-05-26T00:47:18+00:00 List-Id: Richard D Riehle writes: > In article , > Hyman Rosen wrote: > >I wanted it to sound somewhat contentious. The named people each > >claimed in a posting that there were object-oriented techniques > >that were harder, or less elegant, in C++ than in Ada. ...and follows up with code demonstrating the superiority of Ada array handling over the C++ version. I agree completely. Native Ada array handling beats the pants off of native C++ array handling. Any equivalent I could produce in C++ would be longer, require custom classes, and be nowhere near as nice. Array indexing, however, does not normally fall under the heading of object-oriented techniques.