From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6bf9d4ba0cfd8cb6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Hyman Rosen Subject: Re: Announce: OpenToken 2.0 released Date: 2000/02/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 587010610 Sender: hymie@calumny.jyacc.com References: <3890C62B.18309585@telepath.com> <876unj$jcs$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <87d7qck6pm.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org> X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com X-Trace: news.panix.com 950810393 15788 209.49.126.226 (17 Feb 2000 17:59:53 GMT) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Feb 2000 17:59:53 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-17T17:59:53+00:00 List-Id: Hyman Rosen writes: > I would guess that the number of such adversarial platforms is > small, and would not be surprised at all if that number were zero. Apropos of this, I recall more than one thread here on c.l.a where Robert Dewar says that one can legitimately make "ordinary platform" assumptions when programming in Ada. That is, one does not read the A.R.M. or treat the compiler as if they are the enemy and thwarting you at every turn. Conceivably a compiler for any language can be implemented to stick to the letter of its Standard but still be as useless as possible, but then you have the choice of not using it.