From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,897417b380f5731e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Hyman Rosen Subject: Re: The Next Microsoft? Date: 2000/05/05 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 619723303 Sender: hymie@calumny.jyacc.com References: <8eg37k$15n$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8epkoa$b8b$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8eu0ob$7qv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <391328F0.1221@synquiry.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com X-Trace: news.panix.com 957558090 24616 209.49.126.226 (5 May 2000 20:21:30 GMT) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 May 2000 20:21:30 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-05T20:21:30+00:00 List-Id: Jon S Anthony writes: > Stepenov's arguments for this have never made the least bit of sense. > The whole of STL (imo) is wrongheaded from top to bottom and the > template stuff in support shows an equal incompetence. You are entitled to this opinion, but it is wrong. The design of STL is supremely elegant. Not only does it give immense expressive power with simple syntax, it allows the C++ compiler to generate higly efficient code to implement this power. The C++ standardization committee found this library to be so compellingly good that they adopted it into the language and made certain that the language would support it properly. Ada has nothing like it, since it is missing automatic instantiation of generics.