From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,54c513170bafd693
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Hyman Rosen <hymie@prolifics.com>
Subject: Re: Desirability of C++
Date: 2000/05/07
Message-ID: <t7hfcaay65.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 620398360
Sender: hymie@calumny.jyacc.com
References: <390D001C.7433140B@netwood.net>
 <20000507071636.16841.00001779@ng-fz1.aol.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
X-Trace: news.panix.com 957732219 8444 209.49.126.226 (7 May 2000 20:43:39
 GMT)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 May 2000 20:43:39 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-05-07T20:43:39+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

anthonygair@aol.comremoveme (ANTHONY GAIR) writes:
> It could be said that the C++ standard died very quickly indeed

But that would be wrong, as the C++ Standard is actually alive and well.