From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dbcfe2b0a74da57e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.doubleslash.org!open-news-network.org!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Inherited Methods and such
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <1190213376.707449.146640@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <1fl2wnziigxfd.1fjbag2hh8sbc$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1190239986.762473.204290@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
 <1rw45b3rmvmcr$.1df4wst5oknbl$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1190296353.624737.150940@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>
 <11m13st1f92kf$.m8s6y8mc8ebk.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1190321119.206313.65290@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>
 <egz670qwxgyj$.15oz5zin5794w$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1190408526.100291.265040@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
 <9ukf2wtqjs0q$.iuijmal4x56b$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1190497995.498679.119190@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
 <1mw3qju08q8uj.sgzht7ld9ydc$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1190579805.451187.71140@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
 <1i8ksr774bjbj.vpmnx3c0i9qz.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1190646125.024072.310020@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
 <1r9s9v6pcjifl.vp4ktk0unpd1.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1190753631.240548.101820@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
 <wccodfppqg6.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:54:52 +0200
Message-ID: <t7dfrn8rmici.1236yi5d7ghm4.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Sep 2007 14:49:16 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2c42a9bc.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=nUgFl:e2c\6;]cDoEWD6A44IUK<Cl32<14Fo<]lROoR1^YC2XCjHcb9`[l_I6S]895DNcfSJ;bb[5FCTGGVUmh?4LK[5LiR>kg2MiQA@Y:K578
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2141
Date: 2007-09-26T14:49:16+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:21:45 -0400, Robert A Duff wrote:

> Is this something fundamentally broken about constructors,
> or is just another case of uninitialized variables?

Let me throw this in - constructors are basically about statically provable
prevention of un- and mis-initialized things.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de