From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,81cf52699486abe7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Hyman Rosen <hymie@prolifics.com>
Subject: Re: Ada95 Strengths/Weaknesses.
Date: 1999/09/28
Message-ID: <t7btamx4br.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 530389591
Sender: hymie@calumny.jyacc.com
References: <37EED7B8.245C0054@yukyonline.co.yuky>
 <37EF9B98.7F817CC0@pwfl.com> <t7vh8vx6fh.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>
 <1104_938481247@DZOG-CHEN>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
X-Trace: news.panix.com 938544221 6620 209.49.126.226 (28 Sep 1999 18:43:41
 GMT)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.3
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Sep 1999 18:43:41 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-09-28T18:43:41+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

falis@ma.aonix.com (Ed Falis) writes:
> On 27 Sep 1999 19:48:02 -0400, Hyman Rosen <hymie@prolifics.com> wrote:
> > By the way, here's the C++ for your unimplemented third case -
> Not quite the same thing as he did.  Below is Ada code that does what
> your C++ does.

In what way (aside from from function announcement output)
is my C++ code not the same as his Ada code?