From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4f36545ebe2d5763
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Hyman Rosen <hymie@prolifics.com>
Subject: Re: ObjectAda and Feb 29th
Date: 2000/03/08
Message-ID: <t7aek9m9kb.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 594878971
Sender: hymie@calumny.jyacc.com
References: <368601769wnr@natron.demon.co.uk>
 <f5cobssumlck3tr1b5hve88a8tlgmu0dfa@4ax.com> <89j9vq$lvp$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <38c463df@eeyore.callnetuk.com> <t7ln3un337.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com>
 <8a6f1u$5l3$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
X-Trace: news.panix.com 952551180 29477 209.49.126.226 (8 Mar 2000 21:33:00
 GMT)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Mar 2000 21:33:00 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-03-08T21:33:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:
> Well clearly Nick knows that the ANSI C++ standard has been
> issued, otherwise he would not be wondering whether it was
> stablized. Perhaps (not at all unreasonably) he is wondering
> whether this standard is stable. Since almost no one exactly
> implements all of it yet, the question seems reasonable :-)

Are many ANSI/ISO standards unstable? Anyway, since you frequently
point out that GNAT is the only Ada compiler which implements all
of the Annexes of the Ada standard, I could equally well conclude
that the Ada standard has not stabilized either.